Date when decision was rendered: 10.2.1993

Judicial body: Supreme Administrative Court = Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen = Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Reference: Report No. 419; 4149/7/92

Reference to source

KHO 1993-A-29.

Yearbook of the Supreme Administrative Court 1993 A, General Part

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolens årsbok 1993 A, allmän del

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden vuosikirja 1993 A, yleinen osa

Place of publication: Helsinki

Publisher: The Supreme Administrative Court

Date of publication: 1994

Pages: pp. 96-99

Subject

respect for family life, deportation, children, health care, rights of the child,
respekt för familjeliv, utvisning, barn, hälsovård, barnets rättigheter,
perhe-elämän kunnioittaminen, karkottaminen, lapset, terveydenhoito, lapsen oikeudet,

Relevant legal provisions

Sections 1-3 and 41-1 of the Aliens' Act

= utlänningslag 1 § 3 mom., 41 § 1 mom.

= ulkomaalaislaki 1 § 3 mom., 41 § 1 mom.

ECHR-8

Abstract

The expulsion order concerning an Estonian family with several ties to Finnish society, and with a sick child enjoying a proper diet in Finland, was quashed.The Ministry of the Interior had decided to expel the family because they were staying in Finland without a visa or a residence permit.Taking into account the various ties of the family members to Finland and the provisions in Article 8 of the ECHR, the Supreme Administrative Court considered that there did not exist sufficient reason to expel the persons in question.(A vote 4-1)

26.3.1998 / 2.3.2017 / RHANSKI

Date when decision was rendered: 29.10.1993

Judicial body: Supreme Administrative Court = Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen = Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Reference: Report No. 4307; 4720/7/93

Reference to source

Registry of the Supreme Administrative Court

Högsta förvaltingsdomstolens registratorskontor

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden kirjaamo

Date of publication:

Subject

refusal of entry, aliens, health care, respect for family life,
avvisning, utlänningar, hälsovård, respekt för familjeliv,
käännyttäminen, ulkomaalaiset, terveydenhoito, perhe-elämän kunnioittaminen,

Relevant legal provisions

Section 37 of the Aliens Act

= utlänningslag 37 §

= ulkomaalaislaki 37 §.

ECHR-8, CRC-3, CRC-9, CRC-10, CRC-20, CRC-22, CRC-23, CRC-24

Abstract

The Ministry of the Interior decided on the refoulement of a family consisting of 7 citizens of the Former Yugoslav Republic (Kosovo).The Supreme Administrative Court quashed the decision and returned the case to the Ministry for new consideration, as there was new information regarding the health of several family members, who were in need of immediate care.This information was not available when the Ministry of the Interior took its decision.

In its decision, the Supreme Administartive Court refers to Article 8 of the ECHR and various articles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

16.4.1998 / 2.3.2017 / RHANSKI

Date when decision was rendered: 29.10.1993

Judicial body: Supreme Administrative Court = Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen = Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Reference: Report No. 4308; 4721/7/93

Reference to source

Registry of the Supreme Administrative Court

Högsta Förvaltingsdomstolens registratorskontor

Korkeimman hallinto-oikeuden kirjaamo

Date of publication:

Subject

refusal of entry, respect for family life, aliens, health care,
avvisning, respekt för familjeliv, utlänningar, hälsovård,
käännyttäminen, perhe-elämän kunnioittaminen, ulkomaalaiset, terveydenhoito,

Relevant legal provisions

Section 37 of the Aliens Act

= utlänningslag 37 §

= ulkomaalaislaki 37 §.

General reference to respect for family life as provided for in international human rights treaties

Abstract

The Ministry of the Interior had decided on the refoulement of 7 family members who were citizens of the Former Yugoslav Republic (Kosovo).The Supreme Administrative Court had quashed the decision and returned the case to the Ministry for new consideration, as there was new information regarding the health of several family members, who were in need of immediate care.This information was not available when the Ministry for the Interior took its decision.

Taking into account this decision (No. 4307; 4720/7/93), which concerned the parents and sisters and brothers of A, the Supreme Administrative Court quashed also the decision on the refoulement of A and returned the case to the Ministry for new consideration.

16.4.1998 / 2.3.2017 / RHANSKI